09 / 10 · Web quality
Accessibility review
Keyboard, content and form review with prioritised changes.
The starting point
An interface should offer more than one way through.
Access barriers often appear in small actions: invisible focus, a missing label or an error shown only by colour. We review concrete journeys and prioritise fixes with reference to WCAG 2.2.
Make the journey visible
A small action. Clear context.
Enable the visual guide and use Tab to move through the example controls. Visible focus and instructions help you know where you are.
Enter an example reference.
WCAG 2.2 · A review identifies barriers; it does not constitute certification.
Demonstration using fictional data. This is not a connected application or an actual client result.
What you are buying
A clearly defined
first handover.
Base prices for the stated starter scope, including applicable taxes. The final quote and external costs are confirmed before contracting.
- Up to five representative website templates or views.
- Manual keyboard review with supplementary automated checks.
- A report with reproduction steps, priority and the relevant criterion.
- Up to eight hours of fixes in the agreed accessible source code.
Outside this scope
This is not a certification or a statement of full conformance. A complete rebuild, native applications and legal auditing are not included.
What we need
URL, test access where needed, editable source code and priority journeys.
What you receive
Barrier report, agreed fixes and a checklist for your team.
How we verify it
Fixed issues are checked again using the same steps; outstanding issues remain clearly identified.
Timing depends on materials, access and reviews. The date is confirmed in your quote.
Another part of the journey.
All solutions ↗
From the problem to the next version